| Question: |
Hosting and support on top, skipped back with a young project. Moved on to a more productive host. Thank you |
| Answer: |
and what he prodctive ours? |
| Question: |
Maybe not productive but, when all the available settings, the response time is 2 times higher, was of 0.7-0.8 was 0,33-0,4. But can such specificity of my site, not good at this. I admit it was difficult to find where it will work faster. At the price that you have productivity, you have 1 place in Ukraine. |
| Answer: |
and where do You measure? I pinged using this resource Your website https://tools.pingdom.com/#!/sGXmD/http://vozki.com it is loaded in 5 seconds our website for 1.03 sec. https://tools.pingdom.com/#!/blRXMx/http://ukrline.com.ua Or what You mean by response time? |
| Question: |
Tested here https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?hl=ru&url=http%3A%2F%2Fvozki.com%2Fdetskie-kolyaski%2Fx-lander-x-move13.html&tab=desktop |
| Question: |
I did not compare with third-party resources, and only with his, was doing the same backup, and compared the same page |
| Question: |
On your also possible to achieve strong results , but I am not strong, and easier to change the hosting |
| Answer: |
and where there it is possible to check the response time in milliseconds? there tested link equivalent percent and also the test is not very good....line should be green. to be indelicate in relation to colleges, but all the measurements and even Google release that You cited, indicate that there is extensive caching on the server. In other words, the website only works quickly for You and for those who went to the site a second time for the first visitors of Your website to 5 seconds, which is a lot. |
| Question: |
Yes that`s right, we`ll see relative optimization in %, not speed. http://c2n.me/3B6qz55.pngНо it was 0.7-0.8 s |
| Answer: |
give a link for speed measurement on Google |
| Question: |
Here only such service I know at Google https://developers.google.com/speed/pagespeed/insights/?hl=ru&url=http%3A%2F%2Fvozki.com%2Fdetskie-kolyaski%2Fx-lander-x-move13.html&tab=desktop But this is not the loading speed, optimization in General. It will show 40-50 for a site that is loaded 2-3 seconds and 80-86 for 6 sec. But in the first there may be many queries, images at 800x800, for a window of 100x100. And the second more content but everything is well organized including the speed of the response (if it is less than 200 MS it is not displayed in the list of problems.) |
| Answer: |
I told You already, and it was confirmed, included extensive caching, that is, for someone who was on the site, it loaded quickly, for the ex who came first, it is loaded slowly. We believe it is not a fair policy because it does not give the website Owner a complete picture on the work site. As bysro it only works for him. But, everyone chooses for himself. good Luck |
